Nov 24, 2004
Google's Froogle, the "Any Store, Any Thing" Wishlist
Froogle is Google's massive search engine applied to shopping. You look
for an item, and google turns up hundreds of stores and lets you
compare prices.
I've done Amazon wishlists in the past, but I'm always thwarted by their
lack of products outside of books, dvd's, and games.
So I give you my Froogle
Wishlist, which is full of, well, books, dvd's, and games,
ironically.
Want one of your own? Just go to Froogle,
search for a few things from thousands of online
merchants, and click 'Add to list' for any item you want
to add to your Shopping List. You'll need to sign in to
your Google account or create one if you haven't already
(if you have a Gmail account or Groups 2 login, you
already have a Google account). If you want to share
items, just click the 'In Wish List' checkbox and whammo,
you now have a web page of your holiday wish list to
share with friends and family
Go make your own list! Be sure to click "show on wish
list" for each item once you've put it on your personal shopping list.
Stolen from the Google
Blog
3:43 pm | permalink |
/technology/web |
0 writebacks |
A Link to the Past

KDE
2.0. Remember when it was this ugly?
I
started work at
Common Ground
just over two years ago, and one of the
first things I did was install a LAMP (Linux Apache MySQL PHP)
Intranet
server running
PostNuke.
Until
last week when I took the server down to put a new harddrive in, it had
never been rebooted. It had run for 465 days without crashing. Hell, it
had run for 465 days without being touched.
Logging into the desktop was strange. KDE looked ugly, Mozilla took
forever to start, and the Redhat Package Manager desktop app crashed
more than it
ran. The fonts were jaggy and applications seemed boxy and
mismatched, and it just generally looked like crap. I
remembered, briefly, what Open Source used to look and feel like, just
2 years
ago.
I'm an Open Source advocate. I say that freely and without hesitation,
but that does not mean I am an Open Source zealot. As an IT
professional, I've been keenly aware of what the
problems are with Open Source applications and Linux, and what strides
we needed to make.
When I first experimented with Linux back in 1999 (on this very machine
serving
Glitchnyc.com, no less) "Open Source" was synonymous with a web server,
an OS for
servers and supergeeks, and a clunky browser with too many parts. I
remember when downloading an Open Source solution meant you probably had
to put up with a crappy interface, half-there functionality, and lots of
compiling and hand-tweaking.
In just the past 2 years, I've watched the open source software
landscape
mature so quickly it's almost unbelievable. The Gimp finally got GTK 2
support and
went from a quirky, ugly tool to a slick, pro-level photo-editor,
both on
Windows and Linux. The two major Linux desktops, KDE and
Gnome, went from interfaces
that looked like windows
98 on a bad day to rivaling XP and even Mac OS X in sheer sexiness.
Installing and upgrading programs has gone from has gone from
./configure && make && make install (and
pray
you've got the right libraries installed) or rpm dependency hell to point-n-click
with
apt and synaptic.
Mozilla has completely reinvented itself and stripped
the browser down to the 4 meg work of art that is Firefox, and Thunderbird,
its solid mail counterpart.
The list of amazing applications continues to grow:
Scribus gives desktop publishing
apps such a run for their money that
*someone* is
quietly
trying to squash work on the win32 version.
Audacity handles audio
like
a pro, and is getting multi-track support the upcoming version.
OpenOffice.org is pushing
Microsoft
out in more installations than anyone
cares to talk about, and Inkscape
is far and away the easiest vector drawing
tool I've ever used.
Do I think Linux is ready for prime time? I don't know. I think there
are
a lot of hurdles there, but I do know this: Open Source software is
ready for prime time. The Desktop application stack is here, and it's
cross platform. I'm using the same programs on Windows at work and on
Linux at home, and I
love it.
Pretty soon, what OS you're running just isn't going to matter, because
you'll know all the best applications in both places.
2:12 pm | permalink |
/technology/opensource |
0 writebacks |
Great Open Source Games
I've just completed a long article on the current state of open source
software in general that will post tomorrow morning, but I wanted to
split this small piece on games out into a separate post. Without
further ado, I give you 4 great Open Source games which play on Windows
and Linux.
- Battle for Wesnoth
- http://www.wesnoth.org
- The
Battle For Wesnoth is a turn based strategy game. Aside from
the default quest being quite entertaining and extremely
challenging, there is also a lively community producing tons
of downloadable quests and additional graphics.
Game-play is straightforward and fun, and figuring out how many
troops to recruit, how to use them, etc, has kept me up late
quite a few nights recently.
- Liquid War
- http://www.ufoot.org/liquidwar/
- This
one is the most original games I've played in years. You really
just have to play it to understand it, but you control an army
of tens of thousands of units, which move towards your cursor.
Lead them in the right direction, and they'll surround the
enemy and win. Leave their back or flank open, and you're in
hot water. There's so many troops, they really do flow like
liquid.
- JDuplicate
- Neverball
- http://icculus.org/neverball/
- Neverball,
which is a clone of Super Monkey Ball. If you've never played
it, it's like Marble Madness + one of those wooden labyrinth games
you had as a kid on speed. Very addictive. Be warned that this
is 3D on SDL, which means you'll need either a modern graphics
card or a really beefy CPU to make it run well
1:22 am | permalink |
/technology/opensource |
0 writebacks |
Nov 23, 2004
And Then There Were Three
I've
finished the 3rd Vervet, Hypatia. She's named for the "
earliest
woman scientist whose works have been documented"
What stuck me funny as I came back to this drawing this morning after
finishing it late last night was that I know these three characters. It
was completely and utterly unintentional, but very obvious who they
are when you look
at the picture.
Does anyone else see it, or am I going crazy from too many hours of
looking at monkeys and aardvarks? Leave
your guesses in the
comments
Download the
editable SVG
9:57 pm | permalink |
/life/art |
2 writebacks |
Nov 22, 2004
Aristotle and Galileo
Noticing a theme with the
names yet? Ardvark meets these little guys as a class of little monkey scholars. There are about 8 of them in
the pack, and then probably 30 in the class along with the
fully grown Vervet
teacher.
I want to complete at least 4 distinct designs
for the babies before I start to place them on the page. Galileo here is number two, and I'm feeling a lot better about the process
again. Now that I've worked out the basic design ideas for the Baby Vervets, it's a lot easier to turn them out without having to go
through an endless draw-revise-redraw cycle.
I've got the first few pages of the book done in my head. I think i might try to put what I have into a fully laid out PDF "teaser"
once I get the
character designs I need done. The nice part about this project is that it's essentially a bunch of mini projects. SVG is completely
modular, so I can use these exact designs in the fully composed page just by dragging and dropping. Each drawing I finish is another
step closer to having a full book.
I can't wait to get Ardvark on the page with the baby Vervets - they're so tiny, they could ride on him like humans on an elephant!
Here's the Inkscape SVG: Aristotle and Galilelo
2:42 am | permalink |
/life/art |
0 writebacks |
Nov 20, 2004
Hold the Wine!
In my
previous post, I mentioned
firing
up
Wine to run old DOS games under Linux. Turns out that Wine is complete overkill. All you
need is dos, (not the whole windows API,) so that's all you should emulate.
Enter Dosbox. This little program can run just about any old dos game with sound and "real
mode" memory drivers,
allowing you to run
most of your old favorites in a window on Linux.
Best of all, it's a widely supported package, meaning that installing is as easy as doing quick
apt-get install
dosbox
12:44 am | permalink |
/technology/games |
0 writebacks |
Nov 19, 2004
Finding Some Old Favorites

The Incredibly Addictive Torus
Kel was asking me where she
could find the DOS Classic
Torus (OK, well maybe it
wasn't a classic, but we played a lot of it) recently, and that sent me on a web-adventure of sorts. Along the way, I saw several
things I wanted to blog about.
Of course, I have our official "Geoffrey Poole*" copy running around on my server somewhere, so I pointed her in its direction, (*ahem*
/gamez/ *ahem*) but I
was curious to see if the old game was online anywhere.
That led me to dosgamesonline.com where they host old games like torus, and a slew of
others. They've got a rating system as well that lets the best games of old float to the top. Pushover sounds kind of neat. I might have to see
if I can get wine running to try some of these out.
While I'm talking about great dos games, I have to mention Zelda Classic. It's a complete
remake of the old NES/SNES game from the
engine up. While you can play through the official quests, they've got different sprite-sets (skins) that you can apply to the games,
and whole different maps and worlds in a user contributed quest database. Very cool.
Looking back at games from a few years ago is fun, but I'm amazed how many decent projects there were like this that have completely
died out. Were they open sourced, many of these would have grown and morphed along with our operating systems and would still be
available and easily playable today. Not to worry though! There are many great open source games today, and I've got a round-up of a
few new ones coming soon.
8:22 pm | permalink |
/technology/games |
1 writebacks |
Nov 18, 2004
Meet Aristotle, the Baby Vervet
I've finally
completed the base drawing for the Baby Vervets, the first characters
Ardvark meets on his little adventure.
All in all, the drawing wasn't that difficult once I'd worked out how to
simplify the source
photo down to match Ardvark's style, but I did have quite a bit of
"artist's block" trying to get myself to sit down and work on him. I was
afraid it wasn't going to come out, so I wasn't going ahead with it at
all.
Now that I've gotten the first draft done, I'm pretty happy with it. I
have
to decide if I want to leave him with articulated hands and feet or if I
want to simplify them down once more to "mitts" to facilitate drawing
lots of these guys, but I think I'm going
to leave them as is.
Meanwhile, for those of you interested in playing around with the source
drawings, I've made a bunch of updates to the SVG's. Remember,
you'll need the free and open Inkscape
to open these properly. Here they are:
11:57 am | permalink |
/life/art |
0 writebacks |
Nov 14, 2004
Everything Has a Personality

Look at his giant nostrils.
While working on the
second
character for the "
Ardvark the Aardvark" book, I decided
that I should look at some other methods of
drawing eyes.
In particular, with this character, I want to create that big eyed "cute" look that makes people go "awww." You know, like "
Puss in
boots" from
Shrek 2.
So, being unable to think of a proper term for that look, I was googling for the phrase "googly eyes"
(mmm... recursion) and came up with this site:
Everything has a personality! Just add eyes!
Not exactly what I was looking for, but pretty funny. This is why I love the web.
10:27 pm | permalink |
/technology/web |
0 writebacks |
Nov 13, 2004
Gulf War Syndrome Isn't All In Soldier's Heads
It
appears that after 10 years of crack work, a congress mandated panel
have finally put it together that an epidemic of multi-symptom illnesses
in US soldiers returning from the original Gulf War might actually
not
all be in their minds.
I don't know which non-psychosomatic symptom tipped them off: the severe
respiratory symptoms, the
rashes, or the fact that they're all in a goddamn disease cluster, but
it seems that the Army might finally be taking some of the
responsibility
for looking into their conditions. Exposure to Sarin gas
(which only a few troops were potentially exposed to), anti-nerve
gas
agents (getting warmer), and
pesticides (aha!) are all being named as possible causes. Left out in
the article is the cocktail of vaccines, inoculations, and other crap
we shoot our soldiers up with to protect them in the event the enemy
uses chemical or biological weapons.
Potentially life-saving? Yes. Potentially the cause of 70,000
US Soldiers debilitating maladies and seriously degraded quality of
life? Also yes.
Hmm. Wouldn't it have been helpful to figure this all out BEFORE we went
back to the gulf? Somehow, even though Congress mandated this panel in
1998, it didn't even begin it's work until 2002 when it's members were
finally appointed.
Next time you see one of those stupid Taiwanese "support our troops"
magnets on someone's car, rip the damn thing off. It means nothing to
say that now while they're over there and we can do nothing.
Instead, put it in a drawer and bring it out 4 years from now when all
of the kids in the desert now are sick as hell and the government has
forgotten about them and denied them disability.
That's when it's time to support the damn troops.
1:30 am | permalink |
/life |
0 writebacks |
Nov 12, 2004
He's Totally Excited
I've done some more
drawings of Ardvark and tried to give him that excited cuteness that he
exuded in the original drawings. I do really like the slick look of the
SVG's but he's got to convey emotions well to connect with any of the
readers.
Bringing him out of a straight side profile is a bit challenging too,
especially because my art training is extremely limited. I always opted
for photography and video work when taking art in school, and it shows
in my difficulty with bring objects into 3D space. This revision is my
best so far, but at first, Ardvark's little stumpy legs in the "quarter
turned" picture at bottom here made him look like a hybrid pig-dog.
It's amazing how much creativity can spill out of you in a 5 minute
doodle, and then how much you can struggle to fill in the missing bits
and really bring it to life. I can feel myself burning out on this
project, but I'm determined to see it through to completion. The
first draft story
is coming along and about 1/2 done, and then I need to begin deciding
where illustrations should go. It's already too long, and I need to make
some cuts to make it feasible.
At the moment my real challenge is to
stay true to the deranged whimsy that Ardvark was born from and not
hammer this into a complete beginning-middle-end tale. We'll see how it
goes.
12:55 am | permalink |
/life/art |
2 writebacks |
Nov 11, 2004
I'd Forgotten about Headphones
I've spent the last 2 years listening to music on my computer speakers
at
work which are, admittedly, pretty crappy. They do the job though, and
I can listen to them without bothering anyone else in the office.
Sara's new ipod made me realize that I've been hearing only the "top
layer" of music; the lead vocals and loudest instruments, for quite
a while now.
Strapping on my headphones for a bit has made me appreciate some of the
music that's been sitting in my collection unplayed for a while, and I'm
currently digging heavily on VNV
Nation as ambient "New
York Commute" music and even more enthused about the
Garden State Soundtrack.
3:20 pm | permalink |
/technology/gadgets |
2 writebacks |
In Praise of the Tungsten E
News sites yesterday carried word that new models of the Palm
wouldn't
feature OS6 despite earlier promises that they would.
The major benefits of OS6 are supposed to be multitasking and multimedia
support.
Right now, I'm listening to mp3's on my SD card and typing using my
wireless keyboard. Meanwhile, my calendar application pops up a reminder
to get fixings for dinner tonight. I'm doing all of this on OS5 with the
economy model palm, the Tungsten E.
Don't listen to the hype. Unless you're one of the people who will
actually use WiFi or bluetooth support for your palm, just get
the tungsten E. It's more than enough machine for anything your need
your PDA to do.
3:10 pm | permalink |
/technology/gadgets |
0 writebacks |
Nov 10, 2004
This Is Ardvark

Ard: Just one question: Do
aardvarks have noses with tongues and then
separate mouths with
which they can smile?
Or do only ARDvarks have those? :)
Eric:
Just ARDvark. I like to think of it as a "skin fold"
Ard: That's
an excellent way to think of it.
As with everything
else on the site, Ardvark here is released under the
Creative
Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.0 License.That means that
you can
do anything you like with him as long as you include a credit and
release your work under the same license.
Here's the Inkscape SVG
file
I drew this piece in about an hour during my lunch today, using the
successor to Sodipodi, "Inkscape".
It worked brilliantly and didn't
crash once. The tools just work like they should and every time I
thought "Hmm, I wonder if I can do this?" it turned out that there was a
tool for exactly that in the menus.
Get Inkscape, the Free and Open
Source SVG editor, here
3:11 pm | permalink |
/life/art |
0 writebacks |
Nov 09, 2004
Ardvark the Aardvark with the Back Leg Named Bumpus

Hee hee... I'm
Ardvark.
I've
just gotten an idea for a children's book while waiting for, of all
things, windows XP
SP2 to reinstall on a workstation at
CG.
This, of course, warrants two separate blog posts, but as I've had a bit
of blogging burnout (as just about my entire blogging community seems to
have had the past 2 or 3 months), I'll just do a quick sum-up here.
First: SP2 is a serious pain in the ass. If the user has any problems at
all, the rollout from software update services will completely bork the
machine, and fixing it means about 4 hours in front of each terminal as
you uninstall the hotfix, then uninstall the service pack, then reinstall
it, then reinstall a bunch of apps.
Not fun. This should have been marketed as what it was: a full OS
upgrade. I'm glad we didn't have to pay for it, but it should really be
done on a PC by PC basis.
If you're thinking of installing it, be sure to clean your machine of
spyware and disable your virus protection before you do. Don't forget to
turn it back on once you're done.
So while I was waiting there in front of Arden's computer, I began to
doodle.
I had written her a note explaining that it wouldn't be done until
tomorrow morning, and had been to lazy to write out her whole name, just
ending up with Ard.
Naturally, after staring at that note and her abbreviated name for
another 30
minutes, I doodled an Aardvark. He was a cute little guy with a snout
and a smile, and I drew a thought bubble up from him saying "Hee hee....
I'm an ARDvark."
Another 15 minutes passed, and I noticed that I'd misspelled Ardvark,
and decided that that would be his proper name. The problem was, I'd
already drawn a little arrow to him that said "This is Bumpus"
I amended the doodle to say "This is Bumpus. Not the whole aardvark,
just his left leg. He likes eating celery with peanut butter on it, with
little raisins on that. He's a vegan Aardvark. See, 2 a's on aardvark,
but that's not how Ardvark
spells it, that's his proper name. Ardvark the aardvark with the back
leg named Bumpus. "
This medium, of course, does it no justice, but after 4 hours of
watching progress bars, it was hilarious to me.
I'm picturing a whole book with little drawings of Ardvark
the Aardvark, who is constantly talking to his back-left leg
happily, even as other, angrier animals are teasing him for it. That,
and for the fact that his name is spelled wrong.
"It's not misspelled, it's homonymic!"
Hmm... Maybe I'll merge it with my forthcoming SVG tutorial and make it
a CC book. It'll be my
nanowri-draw-mo.
3:13 pm | permalink |
/life |
0 writebacks |
Nov 03, 2004
SharpDevelop GNU .NET / Mono IDE
We're developing a small in-house
database application again here at CG,
and due to the fact that we're a nonprofit, we simply can't afford to
migrate the whole organization to Office 2003 just to make my life a
little easier while coding.
Working with Access 2000's "access project" link to mSQL is far superior
to developing a straight access database, and as a quick and dirty Rapid
Application Development platform it really does get the job done.
The problem is that this is now a very old, VB6 based platform, and the
rest of the world has moved on to vb.net. There were so many quirks and
problems with the VB runtimes that the whole system was scrapped in
favor of the .NET shared runtime and a new vb compiler.
Fed up with things simply not working the way they should, I went in
search of an alternative to Microsoft's wildly expensive Visual
Studio.net.
After a few minutes of googling for "Mono IDE" (mono is
the GNU
implementation of the .NET api) I
came up with a few choices.
For
windows, which I use at work, the most mature seemed to be SharpDevelop, so I
took the
plunge.
I've worked with many IDEs over the past 7 years, and I don't think I've
ever been as impressed with one as I am with SharpDevelop. It's quick,
light, and smart, and the GUI development tools are right on the money.
So far I've hit 0 bugs and effortlessly went from a little HelloWorld
form to an MDI (Multi Document Interface) design complete with
windows-style professional looking menus and functionality.
If you've been waiting to try out .NET because you don't have a copy of
Visual Studio, download SharpDevelop now.
As a quick aside - VisualStudio comes on 4 CDs and loads your system
with MSDN docs, the .net runtimes, and loads of other stuff you don't
need.
SharpDevelop is 5 megs, most of us already have the .net runtimes (if
you don't you can get them at WindowsUpdate) and google works a
heck of
a lot better for me
than MSDN ever did.
3:57 pm | permalink |
/technology/opensource |
0 writebacks |
Please Let Me Be Wrong
I've had a surprising number of my ruminations about the direction of our
country come true in the past 4 years, but this doesn't make me happy,
it makes me scared. Among my predictions:
- We would go to war with Iraq (predicted at the onset of the
offensive in Afghanistan)
- Abu Ghraib abuses were rooted in policy trailing all the way back to
the
White House
- The Democrats would nominate a lame duck to open the "Hillary"
window in
2008 rather than 2012
For posterity, now that we are assured another 4 years of Bush, GOP
dominated Government,
and religious extremism, I am going to put my predictions for the next 4
years
here. I hope more than anything that I am wrong.
On the war and terrorism
- Iraq will not only last 3+ more years, but we will also begin cold
war
style sanctions and non-military offensives
against:
- Iran
- North Korea
- At least one other "terrorist center"
- One of these will blossom into a military confrontation
- The Draft will be reinstated.
- Here on the home-front, there will be another attack, this time
with the terrorist cell claiming to be centered within the US
itself.
- Patriot II will be pushed through, further limiting our
Civil Liberties and permitting discretionary wiretaps on all
citizens. Those who speak out will be on terrorist watch lists.
Neighbors will be encouraged to report any suspicious activity.
On domestic policy
- Bush will appoint 2 more Conservative extremists to the Supreme
Court.
- They will overturn Roe v. Wade
- And ban stem cell research
- Congress will uphold and expand the DMCA.
Get out your tinfoil hats - there's some doozys up there. Please, 4
years from now, let me look back at this post and say "Thank god I was
a nutcase and none of that happened."
12:45 pm | permalink |
/life |
3 writebacks |
Nov 01, 2004
Go Vote.
No matter who you choose tomorrow, no one can deny that the stakes are higher for this election than
they have been in the past half-century. Some things to consider:
- Half of America did not vote in the 2000 elections
- Half of this year's "likely voters" polled are pro-Bush
- Citing a strong post 9/11 connection with Bush, these voters continue to convince themselves
that certain things are true, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary:
- They believe there were weapons of mass destruction. There
were not.
- They believe that Saddam Hussein was connected to Al Qaeda. He was not.
- Half of them believe you can win a military war on Terrorism, a thing you cannot see,
find, or
kill. You
cannot.
- Bush himself has publicly admitted all of these things are untrue, yet continues to wage war,
spread fear, and allow these untruths to spread throughout his campaign.
In 2000, I didn't know who to vote for. The Republican and Democratic parties looked almost identical.
This year, I know one thing. I know who I'm voting against.
11:28 pm | permalink |
/life |
0 writebacks |