Aug 31, 2004
A First Taste of New Orleans

Everything
is a bit muddled in New Orleans. The accents,
the spices in the Gumbo, the waters of the Mississippi,
even the history.
At first brush, the French Quarter seems a historical center-point spoiled by tourism. The bars that literally
line the streets, separated only by Voo-Doo T-Shirt vending tourist traps, have great walls of rotating
slurpee
machines, all ready to dole out multi-flavored lightly alcoholic beverages at the pull of a lever.
As you get closer to the essence of New Orleans, though, you begin to realize that this isn't a seedy surface
painted on by tourism - this is the continuance of a tradition that goes back almost 300 years.
At different times in its history, New Orleans has been controlled by the French, the Spanish (during the
inquisition) and then finally, the American Government. Code Noir, or a set of laws which allowed but limited
slavery, contributed to the large population of Free People of Color and that population helped further
diversify New Orleans' history.
All of this history even predates the Civil War, and the well of history for each tour guide to draw from is
rich and long.
If you make your way to New Orleans, expect to be surprised by the grit of the real industry driving this city:
tourism. New Orleans is and always has been a "Service Oriented" city, and it's current status isn't a
corruption of the history, it's a celebration of it. Once you embrace that, there are tales waiting to be woven
by the expert guides in almost every square inch of soil here.
Photos of the trip
4:04 am | permalink |
/life/travel |
0 writebacks |
Aug 30, 2004
MARRIED!
Well, it's been about a week and a half since anythings been posted here, and with good reason! Sara and I are
now officially hitched, and we're just back from our Honeymoon in New Orleans.
The wedding was amazing - I really don't know if it could have gone any better, even in hindsight. It's almost
statistically impossible for there to be no drama during the wedding itself with 150 of your closest relatives
and friends with you, but amazingly we made it through the day completely crisis free, and it was beautiful.
Put concisely, the best advice I can give to those planning a wedding is not to hold yourself to what
tradition says you must do. Breaking out of a wedding hall/dance centric wedding gave everyone the ability to
enjoy the night as they saw fit, and I think it made everyone just about as happy as can be. Sara and I are
considering writing up our experiences for others in a wiki,
since the
forums on theKnot.com helped so much
during our planning, but we'll see how much free time we have as Sara starts her new job.
I'm writing this from the deck of a riverboat as we ramble down the Mississippi towards the Audubon zoo in New
Orleans, so I'll end it here. There's more to tell, but I'll be splitting it up into more specific vacation
stories as we go.
Thank you to everyone who made the wedding possible, we couldn't have done it without you.
11:59 pm | permalink |
/life |
0 writebacks |
Aug 17, 2004
Review: Nicola Griffith's Slow River

[* * * * 1/2] of 5
More than a year ago, Sara gave me her copy of Slow
River by
Nicola Griffith, and it
sat on my bedside, unread.
Various excuses kept me from reading it: I wanted to be writing my
own
material on the subway instead of reading and, for plausible
deniability, I didn't want to read a sexy, near-future cyberpunk work
which was so similar
to what I was working on. It's much
easier to claim you haven't plagarized when you haven't read the work in
question.
A year later, Lex has fallen by the wayside and I've been reading
again so I finally dusted off her old paperback and started into it.
The book ranks up there with some of my favorite books of all time.
Published in 1995, Griffith portrays a very familiar future,
describing both
the real and the unreal with an eye for detail that makes it
believable. The book also seems almost pure in its ignorance (and
untainted prediction) of the internet hype to
come just a few years later. The systems of the future city are
plausible and simple enough to be natural outgrowths of our current
progress, and are intermingled with the things that invariably stay the
same: nature, human emotion, and dimly lit pubs where people
talk about sex and money.
The book is told in three fractured time lines, which admittedly makes it
a very difficult read if you're not taking it all in a few sittings. It
was hard enough remembering what was happening each time I picked the
book back up on a subway ride without having to recall where we left off
with each timeline, and each transition made me groan, like the season
finale of your favorite show which you must wait all summer to see
concluded.
Having finished the book, there's really no other way Nicola Griffith could have
told the tale. The mystery unravels in each of the timelines (which all
involve the main character, Lore) and you piece the story together as
Lore does, drawing from each of the story arcs.
The fractured feel of the book also brings an added dimension to Lore's
own feeling of being different people; not in the sense of multiple
personalities, but in understanding her own human duality and coming to
terms with all the various facets of herself. Only in the final chapter,
when she begins to understand herself as one person do the storylines
collide and conclude the novel.
Nicola Griffith's skill at weaving the story together overrides the annoyance at
having to wrench yourself from one timeline to another, and the near
future bio-punk epic is required reading... Both literally and
figuratively. It was part of Sara's college curriculum, with good
reason.
10:45 am | permalink |
/life |
0 writebacks |
Aug 12, 2004
On Safety, Freedom, and Protest in 2004
Whether you're a "Liberal Weiner,"
or a "Right Wing Nutjob"
there's one central theme most of our beliefs. Something that is central
to most leftward leaning people, yet is also very traditionally a right wing, republican, feeling: the
desire to
uphold the constitution and the first 10 amendments.
The past 4 years have been trying for those working
to uphold our personal liberties, and those of us
traditionally on the left suddenly find ourselves on
the flip
side of an argument that was all too familiar just before
9/11.
The question is this: what risk, what cost, will you tolerate to
cling to
your constitutionally defined personal liberties?
When it came to the questions of gun control, many
on the left were and are quick to say "sacrifice the liberty of the
right to
bear arms to protect the victims of abuse of that liberty." The right
countered
with the famous phrase "It's not about guns, it's about freedom," and
we
scoffed. We laughed at the idea of a government that would take it's
power to
limit constitutional freedoms and push further into our right to
assemble, our
right to free speech. This argument was about people dying at the
hands of
gun-toting criminals and kids (sometimes accidentally, and
sometimes not) finding their way into their right-wing parents arsenal
and killing themselves and each other. Republicans were were clinging to
"freedom" as an excuse to keep their dangerous toys. Right?
4 years later, the tables have turned.
We're all suddenly understanding that maybe it
wasn't just about guns. That maybe there was something to all of that
rhetoric
about limiting governmental control and the tendency of an empowered
federal
power to grant it self more and more control.
4 years later, our right to assemble has been
deemed a terrorist-aiding activity. Our right to protest takes cops
away from
managing the already risky RNC here in New York.
Our right to bear arms, (or even protest signs
longer than 2 feet, which are deemed weapons) to protect ourselves
from
a
potentially abusive police power as they herd everyone over to the
west side
highway... Oh wait, we've already given that liberty up, haven't
we?
4 years later, we're all suddenly willing
to accept some risks to protect those freedoms. We're willing to accept
the
increased window for terrorist attack, the confusion and mayhem
250,000 people
protesting in New York will cause.
The willingness to accept risk has just
hit critical mass. The planners of the protests are powerless to
corral
their own people. The people have made their intent clear: they
will
protest where they can be heard, far from the fences and free
speech
zones. They
will protest where they can be seen, and be arrested for it,
teargassed for it,
martyrs of "America as a free speech zone."
And protest has hit our our
in-boxes,
our cell phones.
Far from the West Side Highway, Smart Mobs will
pop up
in patterns, disrupting traffic in carefully orchestrated waves,
keeping the
police force thin and guessing, never able to stop a protesting crowd
that uses
text messages and cell-chatter to avoid the police and regroup around
them.
The news has been brewing in the Internet
underground, in emails, on IRC, on Usenet, for almost a year, and it's
just now
hitting the mainstream
news outlets. It's blossoming into full fledged websites like www.xflashmobs.com and being passed
from blog to blog, blanketing the Internet with an understanding of
the gravity
of this event.
This is not going to be an ordinary
protest.
It's not about the Republicans, It's about
Freedom.
References:
Tyranny
in the Name of Freedom, The New York Times
http://www.smartmobs.com/
High-TechLevels
Protest Field, The Washington Times
TXTmobs take
on the
GOP, The Village Voice
http://www.appliedautonomy.com/
http://www.txtmob.com/
http://www.xflashmobs.com/
RNC
preps include protest restrictions, CNN.com
2:31 pm | permalink |
/life |
2 writebacks |
Aug 06, 2004
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

I first heard about
Sky Captain and
the World of Tomorrow at the
con
we
went to a few months ago. At that point, all it was was a picture of
Angelina Jolie in front of a retro-futuristic backdrop on a freebie
poster.
The buzz around the movie was that originally, the director had created
a 5 minute 'pilot' which was completely generated on his Macintosh,
which had then been picked up by a major motion picture house and was
being given a full budget to realize it's potential, once again
completely generated on computers. 100% bluescreen + actors.
Various
interviews confirmed the buzz at the con, adding the detail that
it was Jude Law, (Gigolo Joe from
AI) who had discovered
the director
and 5 minute pilot. Apparently, both the stunning effects and stylistic
vision based "future" of the early 1900s was enough to get
him on-board and he recruited other producers (read: money) and big name
talent like Gwyneth Paltrow to join him on the film.
The extended
trailer is online now. I've usually got a really decent
sense for how a movie will do when it's released, and I wish I could say
that I thought this was going to be a great smash hit. I feel roughly
the same about it now as I did about "Final Fantasy: The Spirits
Within"
before it came out. I'm going to see it and probably love it simply for
the Geek Factor, but I don't know if America will bite without at least
a familiar retro character or premise to help justify the stylistic
theme of the film.
Here's hoping the movie proves me wrong.
5:44 pm | permalink |
/technology/film |
0 writebacks |
Aug 05, 2004
In 16 Days We'll be Married

I've
been lax at posting here the past few weeks mostly
because I feel
that I can't do justice to the amazing events that have transpired in
that time, so in an effort to purge my writer's block, I've decided to
simply do my best to convey the feeling of the many fun nights of the
past 14 days.
New York is an amazing city.
Jersey is NOT an amazing state.
It takes a lot to get me to leave my favorite island for the J-State.
Someday I'll relate the story of 3 cars breaking down, the sky's opening
up, and being stuck in a gas station parking lot for 14 hours in Jersey
here on the
blog, but for know, just know that my hatred isn't unfounded.
Only the Lure of going to Medieval
Times for the first time could get me
back in Jersey's clutches,
and I was afraid that once again the fates would conspire to keep me
trapped in Jersey forever.

Somehow, though, the ominous
backdrop of Jersey was a fitting setting
for the weird and wonderful cheesiness that is Medieval Times. If you've
ever seen The Cable Guy, the actual experience of going to MT is much
the same as it is depicted in the movie, but with both more and less
glitz at times.
Unlike Ren-Faires, MT freely breaks the illusion, taking you from
flashing LED colors in a "commemorative mug" to the actors talking in
(thankfully well practiced) accents and decently engrossing plot, back
to glow-necklaces and Pepsi, and back again to the show.
The juxtaposition of MT being smack in the middle of Jersey, next to
a hotel and a bank, seems to fit remarkably well in light of the dual
worlds that MT itself maintains. Once your brain adjusts and suspends
disbelief, you're both in the middle of the action and at your table
eating, drinking, and buying knick-knacks at once.
Remarkably, the food itself was excellent, and eating with your fingers
does satisfy some voracious need you didn't know you had until you start
doing it. Meg + Co had gotten me a one size fits all "groom" hat, which,
not surprisingly, didn't fit on my massive noggin, so I'm sure i got some
chicken grease on the brim as I shifted it up and down to keep the blood
from pooling in my brain.
Two things stuck with me as I thought about the night later. First - the
show was remarkable. I've been part of and seen my share of stage
combat,
and these guys broke all the rules, swinging full force withing "strike
range" of each others heads and bodies. If the block wasn't there, I
don't believe they could have stopped any of the hits, and some of them
could have been crippling, dulled sword or not. Either they're really
really good, or really careless. Seeing as no one got hurt and they're
doing this
7 nights a week, I think they might just be awesome.
The second thing comes from the other "world" of MT, as I walked back
from the bathroom complete with plastic ball and chain around my ankle,
groom hat, and goofy grin, and two of the waitresses asked me what was
going on.
"I'm here for my bachelor's party"
"You're HERE?" one of the girls replied, rolling her eyes at the other
girl. They were lost in the business world of MT, unable to see the
show, the fun. This was the placed where they worked, decidedly not
cool.
"Yeah, it's great" I said, smiling at them. I was proud of it. I loved
the cheesiness - I loved that my friends had all gone to such lengths to
put it together and to be there - I loved everything about the night. To
me, this was 1000 times cooler than being at some seedy strip joint.
One of the girls stopped with her tray and smiled back. I think she saw
a little bit of what I saw, and that maybe, just a little bit, her job
was once again as cool as I thought it was.
The weeks that followed have been a blur of goodbye celebrations for
Christin and
other festivities, and then my upstate bachelor's party with my brother
and best friend.

The upstate party was
wonderful in its own way, giving me time to
kick back and just enjoy the company as we played hours of poker and
playstation 2. Rye and I have made a tradition of returning to our roots
rather than trying to go out and find stuff to do in suburbia, and it
has yet to fail us. We played
SSX
tricky until we couldn't stay awake
any longer, and damn near beat the game in a weekend.
2:32 pm | permalink |
/life |
3 writebacks |